Harrisburg Criminal Defense Lawyer - York DUI Attorney
Harrisburg DUI & Criminal Defense Attorney Criminal Defense Firm Profile Colgan marzzacco Attorney Profile Frequently Asked Questions Client Testimonials Contact Our Law Firm
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
DUI
Traffic Tickets
CDL Violations
Criminal Defense
You are in:
Criminal Defense
Introduction
Drug Crimes
Theft Crimes
Assault
Murder/Manslaughter
Sex Crimes
Juvenile Crimes
Domestic Violence
Expungements
Click Here to View our Blog
Criminal Defense
Criminal Defense
2 entries found. Viewing page 1 of 1.  
March 19, 2010
  The WHAT IFS of Drug "Possession" Answered
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry

Frequently, I receive calls from individuals who have been charged with some form of drug possession.  Many of these people I speak with did not actually possess the drugs on their "person" -- for example, in a coat or pants pocket.

Naturally, individuals charged under such circumstances inquire as to whether they can actually be charged with possessing the drug.  The simple anwer:  Yes, you can be charged with a crime.  However, the mere fact that the police are in the position to charge you with the crime of drug possession does not mean that there is sufficient evidence to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In an effort to set aside confusion concerning drug "possession," I have answered a few of the What Ifs I commonly receive from individuals who are charged with possession of a drug but did not actually possess the drug(s) on their person.

What if “I didn’t even have the drugs on me?”

Answer: Let’s assume you were pulled over in a traffic stop and a small baggie of drugs was in your center console where the officer could clearly see it.  Where the drugs are not found on a defendant’s person the prosecution must prove “constructive possession.”  In order to prove “constructive possession” of a drug, the prosecution must establish that the individual charged had both the power and the intent to exercise control the drug(s).

But what if “the drugs were in the car and there were other people in the car with me?”

Answer: The theory of “constructive possession” would still apply.  However, now, the prosecution would have to prove “joint constructive possession.”  Under the theory of “joint constructive possession,” two people may have joint control and equal access to the drug and, thereby, both may constructively possess it.  The prosecution can attempt to prove joint constructive possession based upon all the factual circumstances present in any particular case.

As mentioned above, the mere fact that police may be in a lawful position to charge you with a crime of drug possession in any of the above-scenarios, it does not mean that the police and prosecution will be able to prove you are guilty of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt.  Additionally, there may be search and seizure issues that you may be able to attack in defending your case.

The Pennsylvania Drug Defense Attorneys at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, bring to the table the knowledge and experience necessary to defend your rights.  If you have been accused of a drug crime, there may be many questions that you need answered.  More importantly, based upon your limited contact with the criminal justice system, there may be many questions you do not even know to ask.  For example:  Was the traffic stop lawful?  Did the police have the right to search me or my car?  When the police entered my home, did they need a warrant?  Was my consent to the search voluntary?  These are examples of just some of the questions that can come up in a drug case.  Based upon the knowledge obtained through years of experience defending the rights of those accused of crimes, the Drug Defense Attorneys at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, know the questions to ask so you can get the answers you need and deserve.

If you have been charged with drug possession, contact us for a free phone consultation today at 1-866-615-0115.

Continue reading "The WHAT IFS of Drug "Possession" Answered" »

Permalink 
 
January 21, 2010
  "Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers" Fact or Fiction?
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
    Recently, following my son’s school Christmas program, I went to my car to unload some goodies that Santa had delivered to the class.  While returning to the school, I found a $10 bill in the parking lot.  For a moment, I was reminded of the childhood phrase, “finders keepers, losers weepers.”  I returned the $10 bill to the main office at the school assuming that someone finding their pocket a little lighter may inquire about the missing money.
    The moral and ethical implications of the above-scenario can certainly be debated.  However, as a  Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney, the practical question is:  Could failure to return or report the lost money or item carry criminal consequences?  The answer:  Yes. 
    Under the PA Crimes Code, a person who takes control of property of another that is lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake is guilty of theft if he/she intends to deprive the rightful owner of the property and fails to take reasonable measures  to restore the property to the rightful owner.  18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3924. Theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake.   The severity of the penalties an individual charged with this crime is subject to will be based upon the value of the item stolen.  More common factual scenarios subjecting an individual to criminal prosecution for this crime include, but are not limited to, taking a misplaced purse or a voucher left in a slot machine at a casino.
    “Finders keepers, losers weepers?”  Fiction.
    If you find yourself accused of a theft crime in Pennsylvania, contact Attorney Shawn Curry, an experienced criminal defense attorney at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, for a free phone consultation.
Continue reading ""Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers" Fact or Fiction?" »

Permalink 
 
2 entries found. Viewing page 1 of 1.  
Colgan Marzzacco Information Center Click here to be instantly connected to our office.
Main Site Pennsylvania Family Law Attorneys
Injury Law Attorneys South Pennsylvania Criminal Defense

Attorney Web Design

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Principal Office: 130 West Church Street, Suite 100 Dillsburg, York County, PA 17019
Harrisburg Office: 2411 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110
York Office: 1 East Market Street, Suite 201, York, PA 17401