Harrisburg Criminal Defense Lawyer - York DUI Attorney
Harrisburg DUI & Criminal Defense Attorney Criminal Defense Firm Profile Colgan marzzacco Attorney Profile Frequently Asked Questions Client Testimonials Contact Our Law Firm
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
DUI
Traffic Tickets
CDL Violations
Criminal Defense
You are in:
Criminal Defense
Introduction
Drug Crimes
Theft Crimes
Assault
Murder/Manslaughter
Sex Crimes
Juvenile Crimes
Expungements
Click Here to View our Blog
Criminal Defense
Criminal Defense




Recent Blog Posts in 2010

13 posts found. Viewing page 1 of 1.  
August 04, 2010
  Arrests at Hersheypark Concerts
Posted By David E. Hershey, Esq.
    We are at the height of the summer concert series in Hershey, Pennsylvania. Regardless who the performer is, Derry Township Police will be actively seeking out underage drinking violators, drug possession violators and DUI violators. Non-residents who come into Hersheypark Stadium, The Star Pavilion or the Giant Center for concerts need to know the potential long-term consequences if they are arrested for any of the above crimes. Under Pennsylvania Law, an individual may be in constructive possession of an illegal substance, including alcohol, if that person is in close proximity to the substance and has the ability and the intent to control the substance. Circumstantial evidence is admissible to prove whether someone is in constructive possession of an illegal substance. If you are in a group of people traveling together in an automobile, SUV or van, standing in front of an open alcohol container or passing it to another individual may be sufficient for the police to charge you with underage possession of an alcoholic beverage. This violation carries a mandatory driver’s license suspension in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This driver’s license suspension can interfere with your ability to renew your driver’s license in your home state. The rules of constructive possession also apply to drug offenses. Passing a joint to a friend, even if you are not smoking it, may be enough for you to be charged with drug possession. Drug possession charges in Pennsylvania also carry driver’s license suspension. In some instances, a drug conviction license suspension may be transferable to your home state. Being in physical control of an automobile in a parking lot in Pennsylvania while under the influence of alcohol or a drug is sufficient for law enforcement to charge the offense of driving under the influence, even if the vehicle is not moving at the time of the encounter with police. Additionally, Pennsylvania has a zero tolerance standard for use of certain drugs, such a marijuana, while in physical control of the movement of a vehicle. You could be charged with Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana with any measurable amount of marijuana in your bloodstream even if you are not impaired by the drug. If you have been arrested for any of the above offenses and need legal representation in Hershey, Pennsylvania located in Dauphin County, contact Attorney David E. Hershey at the law offices of Colgan Marzzacco, LLC.
Continue reading "Arrests at Hersheypark Concerts" »

Permalink
 
July 07, 2010
  "OPERATION CLEAN SLATE"
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry

    "Operation Clean Slate" will be taking place in York County on July 29 & 30, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the Bible Tabernacle Church, 361 South Pine Street, York, PA.

    According to the York County Sheriff's Office website, this program will be implemented by the York County Sheriff's along with the cooperation of the Office of the District Attorney and the faith-based community.  The purpose of "Operation Clean Slate" is to offer persons with outstanding, arrest warrants an opportunity to voluntarily surrender in a neutral and controlled setting. 

    "Operation Clean Slate" is a unique opportunity for individual's with outstanding warrants to resolve this issue that may be creating an undue burden on their lives.  For example, if you have warrants for unpaid parking tickets in York County in multiple jurisdictions, this may be an opportunity for you to resolve them all at once.  However, there may be people who have outstanding warrants for more serious criminal offenses.  For such people, the neutral and controlled setting presents an opportunity to safely surrender without incident.

     If you have outstanding warrants, you should discuss your specific issue with a qualified and experienced attorney prior to taking any steps that may place you at the mercy of the criminal justice system.  Contact Criminal Defense Attorney Shawn M. Curry of Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, at scurry@cmlaw1.com or call (800) 615-0115 to set up a free phone consultation today.

Continue reading ""OPERATION CLEAN SLATE"" »

Permalink
 
May 12, 2010
  Memorial Day DUI Checkpoints
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
    With Memorial Day fast approaching, those choosing to celebrate this holiday by raising a glass of their favorite adult beverage should anticipate aggressive DUI enforcement and DUI checkpoints from law enforcement. From Dauphin to York County, Cumberland to Perry County, Juniata to Mifflin County, and beyond, police will be cracking down on DUIs in Pennsylvania.

    The police know what we all know:  While Memorial Day offers many an opportunity to spend time and celebrate the holiday with family and friends, many of us will choose to celebrate by drinking a few alcoholic beverages, whether it be beer, wine, or a mixed cocktail.  Based on this knowledge, the police will seize the opportunity to aggressively enforce Pennsylvania's drinking and driving laws.

    It is important for those choosing to celebrate Memorial Day by throwing back a cold one to understand and anticipate the police response to this holiday.  To that end, people who choose to drink alcoholic beverages should make alternative arrangements for transportation as opposed to drinking and driving.  If you are going to celebrate Memorial Day by attending a picnic, party, or bar and consume alcohol, you should select a designated driver prior to going out or call a cab.

    Based on our firm's years of experience as PA DUI Defense Attorneys, we know the costs of a DUI can far exceed the costs of a cab.  From a basic financial standpoint, mandatory minimum fines for a first offense DUI range from $300 to $1,000.  For a second or subsequent offense, the fines alone escalate.  This does not even consider the collateral costs that can result from mandatory jail time and license suspensions.

    If you choose to celebrate on Memorial Day and party, don't drink and drive.  If you or someone you know is arrested for DUI on Memorial Day or anytime, contact a Pennsylvania DUI Defense Attorney at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC.
Continue reading "Memorial Day DUI Checkpoints" »

Permalink
 
May 12, 2010
  Parents and Students and Administrators and...Sexting?
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
    Lions and tigers and bears...oh my!?  Dorothy is nowhere in sight and this is neither a dream nor a joke.  The recent phenomenon of sexting makes the consequences no less real.  In fact, you do not need to look very far to find out how harsh this reality is, as parents, students, and administrators in the Susquenita School District are experiencing the sexting impact first-hand. (See The Patriot-News article, "Authorities investigate Susquenita High School officials' handling of images during sexting investigation," http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/05/authorities_are_investigating.html)

    As defined by Wikipedia, "[s]exting is the act of sending sextually explicit messages or photographs, primarily between mobile phones."  In the initial sexting investigation at Susquenita High School, police alleged that nude photographs and a video portraying a sexual act where the students involved were under the age of 18 were taken and shared among other students.  As a result, several students were charged criminally with "sexual abuse of children."

    "Sexual abuse of children," by its legal definition, encompasses both the viewing and dissemination or transfer of images depicting a child under 18 in the performance of a sexual act or simulation of the same.  18 Pa.C.S.A. §6312.  In essence, this charge is what many would refer to as "possession of child pornography."  As if the words alone are not stigmatizing enough, a child under 18 charged with this offense could become involved in the juvenile justice system, which may subject the child to possible detention in a juvenile facility, future sex offender registration requirements, and/or a felony, criminal record.

    Now, as referenced in the above-article, the Susquenita High School investigation has taken a new turn with the focus on administrators.  If the investigation uncovers improper transfer of the sexting materials by adult administrators, they too could be charged with sexual abuse of children.  For an adult, a conviction for this charge could mean jail time, mandatory sex offender registration, and/or a felony, criminal record.

    Sexting is real.  Its consequences are real.  And, what may start out as an innocent joke without malice or ill-will can result in anything but a joke.  Thus, equipped with this new information and this horrible reality brought to light, parents need to educate their children of the dangers of sexting.

    If you, your child, or someone you know has become the target of a sexting investigation, no statements should be made to any investigating agency and Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorney Shawn M. Curry with Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, should be contacted immediately.
    
Continue reading "Parents and Students and Administrators and...Sexting?" »

Permalink
 
May 11, 2010
  "You have a right to remain silent"?
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry

    In the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held:  "[A suspect] must be warned prior to any questioning [1] that he has the right to remain silent, [2] that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, [3] that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and [4] the if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires."  Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436.  These words have become universally known as "Miranda Warnings" or "Miranda Rights."  However, due to two (2) recent United States Supreme Court decisions, the effect of these words and rights they give a suspect have been limited.

    First, in Florida v. Powell, No. 08-1175 (Decided February 23, 2010), the U.S. Supreme Court failed to provide a precise formula or express terms necessary for determining whether an officer's words adequately advise a suspect of his or her right to counsel.  In Powell, following an arrest, the suspect was told:  "You have a right to talk to a lawyer before answering any of our questions" and "[y]ou have the right to use any of these rights at any time you want during this interview."  Rather than follow what appeared to be the clear and consistent terms of Miranda -- "you have the right to the presence of an attorney" -- the Court decided to provide police discretion in how they advise a suspect of his/her right to counsel.

    Second, and one day following the Powell decision, the U.S. Supreme Court took the opposite approach in Maryland v. Shatzer, No. 08-680 (Decided February 24, 2010), when it created a 14 day bright-line rule as the length of time for which an invocation of one's right to counsel will stand following a release from custody.  As a result, merely exercising your right to remain silent and/or right to counsel does not have a lasting impact. Instead, any time the police attempt to engage a suspect in questioning, the individual should repeatedly re-assert his/her right to remain silent.

    The moral of the story:  If the police ever attempt to question you, do not rely upon them to clearly inform you of your rights.  Rather, immediately assert your Miranda Rights until you have the opportunity to speak with and be guided by a knowledgable and experienced Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorney.

Continue reading ""You have a right to remain silent"?" »

Permalink
 
April 23, 2010
  What Every Parent Should Know About Common Out of State Tickets and Citations
Posted By Attorney Dave Hershey
Your 18 year old son or daughter is off to Ocean City, Maryland for a week to celebrate graduation.  What happens if he or she gets a speeding ticket or is arrested for drug possession or underage drinking?  When young adults make bad decisions in other states, the legal ramifications can be severe.  Bad decisions can even affect your teen's Pennsylvania driver's license.

If your teen has a regular Pennsylvania driver's license, points will not be assigned against their Pennsylvania driver record if convicted of a drug offense or underage drinking.  However, ignoring the ticket, or a delay in responding to the ticket will create serious problems.  Once the issuing state notifies PennDOT that the ticket has been ignored, PennDOT will suspend the teenager's Pennsylvania driving privileges indefinitely until they properly respond to the out of state court.  Also, the teen driver will now have Driver License restoration requirements in Pennsylvania that must be met before driving privileges are reinstated.  If this happens, your teen driver will have a permanent black mark on his or her driving history.  

Underage drinking laws vary from state to state, but all can affect a Pennsylvania driver, so before responding to such a citation, parents should contract an experienced Criminal Lawyer and Driver License Lawyer at Colgan Marzzacco for proper advice and assistance. 

Drug charges occurring out of state which are reported back to PennDOT will result in a license suspension of at least six months in Pennsylvania.  If your teen driver gets convicted of drug charges in another state, make sure you consult an experienced Driver License Lawyer at Colgan Marzzacco to seek advice about your options under Pennsylvania law.  Call today to set up a consultation!
Continue reading "What Every Parent Should Know About Common Out of State Tickets and Citations" »

Permalink
 
March 19, 2010
  The WHAT IFS of Drug "Possession" Answered
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry

Frequently, I receive calls from individuals who have been charged with some form of drug possession.  Many of these people I speak with did not actually possess the drugs on their "person" -- for example, in a coat or pants pocket.

Naturally, individuals charged under such circumstances inquire as to whether they can actually be charged with possessing the drug.  The simple anwer:  Yes, you can be charged with a crime.  However, the mere fact that the police are in the position to charge you with the crime of drug possession does not mean that there is sufficient evidence to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In an effort to set aside confusion concerning drug "possession," I have answered a few of the What Ifs I commonly receive from individuals who are charged with possession of a drug but did not actually possess the drug(s) on their person.

What if “I didn’t even have the drugs on me?”

Answer: Let’s assume you were pulled over in a traffic stop and a small baggie of drugs was in your center console where the officer could clearly see it.  Where the drugs are not found on a defendant’s person the prosecution must prove “constructive possession.”  In order to prove “constructive possession” of a drug, the prosecution must establish that the individual charged had both the power and the intent to exercise control the drug(s).

But what if “the drugs were in the car and there were other people in the car with me?”

Answer: The theory of “constructive possession” would still apply.  However, now, the prosecution would have to prove “joint constructive possession.”  Under the theory of “joint constructive possession,” two people may have joint control and equal access to the drug and, thereby, both may constructively possess it.  The prosecution can attempt to prove joint constructive possession based upon all the factual circumstances present in any particular case.

As mentioned above, the mere fact that police may be in a lawful position to charge you with a crime of drug possession in any of the above-scenarios, it does not mean that the police and prosecution will be able to prove you are guilty of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt.  Additionally, there may be search and seizure issues that you may be able to attack in defending your case.

The Pennsylvania Drug Defense Attorneys at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, bring to the table the knowledge and experience necessary to defend your rights.  If you have been accused of a drug crime, there may be many questions that you need answered.  More importantly, based upon your limited contact with the criminal justice system, there may be many questions you do not even know to ask.  For example:  Was the traffic stop lawful?  Did the police have the right to search me or my car?  When the police entered my home, did they need a warrant?  Was my consent to the search voluntary?  These are examples of just some of the questions that can come up in a drug case.  Based upon the knowledge obtained through years of experience defending the rights of those accused of crimes, the Drug Defense Attorneys at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, know the questions to ask so you can get the answers you need and deserve.

If you have been charged with drug possession, contact us for a free phone consultation today at 1-866-615-0115.

Continue reading "The WHAT IFS of Drug "Possession" Answered" »

Permalink
 
March 16, 2010
  St. Patrick's Day DUI Checkpoints - Cumberland, Dauphin, & York County
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
    With St. Patrick's Day fast approaching, those choosing to celebrate this holiday by raising a glass of their favorite ale should anticipate aggressive DUI enforcement and DUI checkpoints from law enforcement.

    The police know what we all know:  St. Patrick's Day offers a right of passage or excuse for partying and drinking alcohol, which can easily become excessive as the party rolls on.  Based on this knowledge, the police will seize the opporunity to aggressively enforce Pennsylvania's drinking and driving laws.

    It is important for St. Patrick's Day partygoers to understand and anticipate the police response to this holiday.  To that end, people who choose to party should make alternative arrangements for transportation as opposed to drinking and driving.  If you are going to celebrate St. Patty's Day by attending a private party or bar and consume alcohol, you should select a designated driver prior to going out or call a cab.

    Based on our firm's years of experience as PA DUI Defense Attorneys, we know the costs of a DUI can far exceed the costs of a cab.  From a basic financial standpoint, mandatory minimum fines for a first offense DUI range from $300 to $1,000.  For a second or subsequent offense, the fines alone escalate.  This does not even consider the collateral costs that can result from mandatory jail time and license suspensions.

    If you choose to celebrate on St. Patrick's Day and party, don't drink and drive.  If you or someone you know is arrested for DUI on St. Patrick's Day or anytime, call a PA DUI Defense Attorney at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, with offices in Dillsburg, Harrisburg, & York, and mention this blog:  1-800-615-0115.
Continue reading "St. Patrick's Day DUI Checkpoints - Cumberland, Dauphin, & York County" »

Permalink
 
March 12, 2010
  A False Sense of Entitlement
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
    Due to the difficult economic times, it is easy for people to feel overworked and underpaid.  Many people may feel that Big Business is taking advantage of the working class -- the rich are getting richer; the poor, poorer; and, the middle further skewed. 

    As a result of feeling undercompensated and unappreciated, it is easy to feel that rewarding oneself with some small "token" of appreciation -- free food or unused gift card -- is well-deserved and too little to be noticed.  Unfortunately, it is this sense of entitlement that the law says is both false and criminal.

    Under Pennsylvania law, the actions described above would be recognized as Theft By Unlawful Taking, which makes it unlawful to take the property of another with the intent to deprive the property owner of its use.  Essentially, whenever you take an item from your employer or place of business, they are deprived of its use.

    The penalties for the criminal charge of Theft by Unlawful Taking are dependent on the value of the property taken.  With the right Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorney, even a person actually guilty of the crime, may be able to minimize the penalties they face.  Separately, depending on the facts in any given case, an experienced and knowledgable attorney may be able to build a defense in order to fight your case.

    If you or someone you know has been charged with theft or any criminal offense, contact Criminal Defense Attorney Shawn M. Curry for a free consultation by phone at 1-800-615-0115.  If an in-office appointment is necessary, Mr. Curry can accommodate you with offices in Dillsburg, Harrisburg, or York, PA.
Continue reading "A False Sense of Entitlement" »

Permalink
 
March 04, 2010
  City of Harrisburg Enacts Law Banning Cell Phones While Driving
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
Recently, a law banning the use of cell phones while driving has been enacted in the City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.  The police are now enforcing and issuing citations to those who are caught talking or texting on their cell phones while driving.  The fines increase for each time a person is cited for the offense.

One of the issues that will need to be addressed by police seeking to enforce the cell phone ban is:  Proof of Notice of the Law.  Essentially, the police will likely have to prove that those charged with this offense knew that there was a law against the use of cell phones while driving in the City of Harrisburg. 

However, currently, no signs have been posted in the city notifying drivers of the ban.  As a result, police stopping drivers who are using cell phones may ask the driver if he or she knew of the law/ban.  If you are stopped for using your cell phone while driving, do not admit that you knew of the ban and contact an attorney at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, right away.
Continue reading "City of Harrisburg Enacts Law Banning Cell Phones While Driving" »

Permalink
 
March 01, 2010
  What is a Preliminary Hearing?
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry

    You’ve been accused of a crime and now you are scheduled for a Preliminary Hearing.   What is it?

    Your Preliminary Hearing is your first court appearance, which occurs before a Magisterial District Judge.   It is what it says it is:   “preliminary.”   It is your initial opportunity to challenge the basic sufficiency of the prosecution’s case against you.  

    It is not a determination of guilty or innocence.   However, this fact should not trigger a person accused of a crime to take the Preliminary Hearing lightly.   In many cases, it is your first and best opportunity to lay the ground work to achieve your overall objectives.   Whether you intend to fight your charges or engage in negotiations in an effort to minimize the significant consequences you could be facing, you need an attorney with the knowledge and experience to prepare and execute a plan of attack to that end.
    
    If you have been charged with a crime, contact Criminal Defense Attorney Shawn M. Curry, Esquire, of Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, at scurry@cmlaw1.com or call (800) 615-0115 to set up a free phone consultation today.

Continue reading "What is a Preliminary Hearing?" »

Permalink
 
January 21, 2010
  "Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers" Fact or Fiction?
Posted By Attorney Shawn Curry
    Recently, following my son’s school Christmas program, I went to my car to unload some goodies that Santa had delivered to the class.  While returning to the school, I found a $10 bill in the parking lot.  For a moment, I was reminded of the childhood phrase, “finders keepers, losers weepers.”  I returned the $10 bill to the main office at the school assuming that someone finding their pocket a little lighter may inquire about the missing money.
    The moral and ethical implications of the above-scenario can certainly be debated.  However, as a  Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney, the practical question is:  Could failure to return or report the lost money or item carry criminal consequences?  The answer:  Yes. 
    Under the PA Crimes Code, a person who takes control of property of another that is lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake is guilty of theft if he/she intends to deprive the rightful owner of the property and fails to take reasonable measures  to restore the property to the rightful owner.  18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3924. Theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake.   The severity of the penalties an individual charged with this crime is subject to will be based upon the value of the item stolen.  More common factual scenarios subjecting an individual to criminal prosecution for this crime include, but are not limited to, taking a misplaced purse or a voucher left in a slot machine at a casino.
    “Finders keepers, losers weepers?”  Fiction.
    If you find yourself accused of a theft crime in Pennsylvania, contact Attorney Shawn Curry, an experienced criminal defense attorney at Colgan Marzzacco, LLC, for a free phone consultation.
Continue reading ""Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers" Fact or Fiction?" »

Permalink
 
January 20, 2010
  Welcome!
Posted By Criminal Defense Attorney
Welcome to our Blog!
Continue reading "Welcome!" »

Permalink
 
13 posts found. Viewing page 1 of 1.  
Colgan Marzzacco Information Center Click here to be instantly connected to our office.
Main Site Pennsylvania Family Law Attorneys
Injury Law Attorneys South Pennsylvania Criminal Defense
South Central Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorney
Contact Us
Site Map

Attorney Web Design The information on this South Central Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorney / DUI Attorney website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Dillsburg Office: 130 West Church Street, Suite 100   Dillsburg, Pennsylvania, 17019
Harrisburg Office: 2411 North Front Street,   Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110
York Office: 204 North George Street, Suite 200   York, Pennsylvania, 17401